toki/agentic-framework
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

sync: from iop v1.1.132

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
toki 2026-06-06 13:59:18 +09:00
parent 624584ffce
commit 8a39ee4d78
3 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
agent-ops/.version
View file

@ -1 +1 @@
1.1.131
1.1.132

3
agent-ops/skills/common/code-review/SKILL.md
View file

@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ Before writing the verdict:
- Compare actual source files against every planned checklist item.
- Compare the plan `구현 체크리스트` and review stub `구현 체크리스트`; repair non-behavioral drift when implementation remains judgeable.
- Directly repair obvious non-behavioral source nits when safe: typos, stale comments, docs, or formatting only, with no behavior/test/API contract change.
- If a checklist item contains integrated verification for a feature, treat that feature item as incomplete until both implementation evidence and the matching verification output are present. Do not accept a separate unchecked completion-criteria item as a substitute.
- Confirm the implementation marked the matching checklist items in the active review file, including the final mandatory `CODE_REVIEW-*-G??.md` completion item; repair clear artifact drift when evidence supports completion.
- Treat review artifact gaps as failures only when they prevent judging implementation correctness, tests, contracts, or verification trust.
@ -187,7 +188,7 @@ Issue severity:
- `Required`: correctness, API contract, missing required test, missing integrated verification, plan-completeness issue, or review artifact gaps that prevent judging implementation quality.
- `Suggested`: useful improvement that should enter the loop but does not block correctness.
- `Nit`: tiny cleanup; may be recorded without forcing WARN.
- `Nit`: tiny cleanup; directly repair obvious non-behavioral cases when safe, otherwise record without forcing WARN.
Verdict consistency:

1
agent-ops/skills/common/plan/SKILL.md
View file

@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ Routing rules:
- Use `cloud-G07` or higher only when terminal-agent or external interactive behavior is central and cannot be made deterministic for local handling, or when the task requires more source/test/diff/log context than local can hold without omitting material evidence: shell/CLI workflow implementation, bin script orchestration, process control, stdout/stderr parsing, exit-status contracts, long-running command diagnosis, terminal benchmark-style tasks, TUI/PTY/browser/screen repaint/cursor stream behavior, real bin/smoke/integration failures after unit tests passed, or very large cross-module/cross-domain changes that cannot be safely split.
- Review uses the same balance: choose `local` for review-detectable work with bounded scope, bounded context, and rerunnable verification, and choose `cloud` for reviews requiring frontier-level judgment, larger-than-local context, weak tests, security/auth, storage/migration, concurrency, protocol/schema, cross-domain behavior, repeated Required issues, or untrusted verification evidence.
- Treat non-behavioral review artifact drift as reviewer-repairable unless it prevents judging implementation correctness, tests, or contracts.
- Treat obvious non-behavioral source nits as reviewer-repairable too: typos, stale comments, docs, or formatting only, with no behavior/test/API contract change.
- Raise `GNN` with scope, ambiguity, missing tests, irreversible behavior, and blast radius after lane selection; keep grade model-independent.
Directory states: